Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro
WS/A/220, 2020 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frank van Kreveld (1051)
- Black
- Silverio Barroqueiro
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/A/220
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frank van Kreveld (1051) and Silverio Barroqueiro was played at WS/A/220 in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frank van Kreveld games or Silverio Barroqueiro games? This Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro?
Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Silverio Barroqueiro.
What opening was played in Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frank van Kreveld vs Silverio Barroqueiro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.