Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi
Recklinghausen Open 16th, 2006 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Raimond Kreslawski (2191)
- Black
- Evgen Zemskyi (1903)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Recklinghausen Open 16th
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Raimond Kreslawski (2191) and Evgen Zemskyi (1903) was played at Recklinghausen Open 16th in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Raimond Kreslawski games or Evgen Zemskyi games? This Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi?
Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi (2006) finished 1–0, a win for Raimond Kreslawski.
What opening was played in Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Raimond Kreslawski vs Evgen Zemskyi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.