Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey
2010 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emmanuel Kravitzch (1988)
- Black
- Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey (2126)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emmanuel Kravitzch (1988) and Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey (2126) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emmanuel Kravitzch games or Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey games? This Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey?
Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (ECO A69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emmanuel Kravitzch vs Philippe Ribaud-Chevrey, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.