Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov
Sparkassen GM, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladimir Kramnik (2790)
- Black
- Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (2761)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Sparkassen GM
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladimir Kramnik (2790) and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (2761) was played at Sparkassen GM in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladimir Kramnik games or Shakhriyar Mamedyarov games? This Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov?
Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Vladimir Kramnik.
What opening was played in Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (ECO D38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladimir Kramnik vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.