Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda
2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kurt Melik Kramer (2004)
- Black
- Jorge Gil Ojeda (1845)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kurt Melik Kramer (2004) and Jorge Gil Ojeda (1845) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kurt Melik Kramer games or Jorge Gil Ojeda games? This Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda?
Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Kurt Melik Kramer.
What opening was played in Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kurt Melik Kramer vs Jorge Gil Ojeda, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.