Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin
74. Moscow Blitz, 2020 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ge Kozlov (2386)
- Black
- Alexei Gubajdullin (2343)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 74. Moscow Blitz
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ge Kozlov (2386) and Alexei Gubajdullin (2343) was played at 74. Moscow Blitz in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ge Kozlov games or Alexei Gubajdullin games? This Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin?
Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (ECO E98).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ge Kozlov vs Alexei Gubajdullin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.