Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov
Chigorin Mem Classic Open, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valery Kozenkov (2123)
- Black
- Mikhail Obrezchikov (1994)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Chigorin Mem Classic Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valery Kozenkov (2123) and Mikhail Obrezchikov (1994) was played at Chigorin Mem Classic Open in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valery Kozenkov games or Mikhail Obrezchikov games? This Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov?
Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Valery Kozenkov.
What opening was played in Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (ECO E16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valery Kozenkov vs Mikhail Obrezchikov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.