Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Igor Kowalski (1806)
- Black
- Jakub Lech Pajak (1756)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Igor Kowalski (1806) and Jakub Lech Pajak (1756) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Igor Kowalski games or Jakub Lech Pajak games? This Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak?
Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (ECO B39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Igor Kowalski vs Jakub Lech Pajak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.