Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko
Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantin Kovylin (2086)
- Black
- Ekaterina Bobko (2063)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantin Kovylin (2086) and Ekaterina Bobko (2063) was played at Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantin Kovylin games or Ekaterina Bobko games? This Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko?
Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Konstantin Kovylin.
What opening was played in Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantin Kovylin vs Ekaterina Bobko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.