Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek
OP-04280, 2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petr Kovar (1944)
- Black
- Darko Pocivavsek (1425)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- OP-04280
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petr Kovar (1944) and Darko Pocivavsek (1425) was played at OP-04280 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petr Kovar games or Darko Pocivavsek games? This Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek?
Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Darko Pocivavsek.
What opening was played in Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petr Kovar vs Darko Pocivavsek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.