Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner
Corr ch-RUM district, 1990 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Abel Kovacs (1034)
- Black
- Guenther Dorner (2180)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr ch-RUM district
- Year
- 1990
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Abel Kovacs (1034) and Guenther Dorner (2180) was played at Corr ch-RUM district in 1990 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Abel Kovacs games or Guenther Dorner games? This Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner?
Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner (1990) finished 0–1, a win for Guenther Dorner.
What opening was played in Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Abel Kovacs vs Guenther Dorner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.