Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma
14. ch-EUR Ind women, 2013 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Radmila Kovacevic (2029)
- Black
- Elena-Luminita Cosma (2329)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 14. ch-EUR Ind women
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Radmila Kovacevic (2029) and Elena-Luminita Cosma (2329) was played at 14. ch-EUR Ind women in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Radmila Kovacevic games or Elena-Luminita Cosma games? This Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma?
Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Elena-Luminita Cosma.
What opening was played in Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Radmila Kovacevic vs Elena-Luminita Cosma, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.