Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik
Int Open ch-SVK 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandar Kovac (2156)
- Black
- Igor Gazik (2314)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Int Open ch-SVK 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandar Kovac (2156) and Igor Gazik (2314) was played at Int Open ch-SVK 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandar Kovac games or Igor Gazik games? This Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik?
Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Igor Gazik.
What opening was played in Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (ECO E68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandar Kovac vs Igor Gazik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.