Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka
42. ch-GRE Women 2019, 2019 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amalia Koutsidi (1724)
- Black
- Ioulia Makka (2048)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 42. ch-GRE Women 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amalia Koutsidi (1724) and Ioulia Makka (2048) was played at 42. ch-GRE Women 2019 in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amalia Koutsidi games or Ioulia Makka games? This Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka?
Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amalia Koutsidi vs Ioulia Makka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.