Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz
Ruhrgebiet Ch Seniors 11th, 2004 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ernst Kotzem (2136)
- Black
- Hans Goertz (2002)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Ruhrgebiet Ch Seniors 11th
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ernst Kotzem (2136) and Hans Goertz (2002) was played at Ruhrgebiet Ch Seniors 11th in 2004 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ernst Kotzem games or Hans Goertz games? This Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz?
Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz (2004) finished 1–0, a win for Ernst Kotzem.
What opening was played in Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ernst Kotzem vs Hans Goertz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.