Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva
21. Open, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski (1867)
- Black
- Vitalia Gordeeva (1679)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 21. Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski (1867) and Vitalia Gordeeva (1679) was played at 21. Open in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski games or Vitalia Gordeeva games? This Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva?
Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Vitalia Gordeeva.
What opening was played in Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (ECO D55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ireneus, Dr. Kostowski vs Vitalia Gordeeva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.