Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandr Kostiukov (2385)
- Black
- Alexey Tikhomirov (2320)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandr Kostiukov (2385) and Alexey Tikhomirov (2320) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandr Kostiukov games or Alexey Tikhomirov games? This Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov?
Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov finished 1–0, a win for Alexandr Kostiukov.
What opening was played in Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandr Kostiukov vs Alexey Tikhomirov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.