Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin
1. 3-0 Thu 12. Feb 2026, 2026 · Result 1–0 · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jakub Kosakowski (2538)
- Black
- Nikita Shandrygin (2209)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. 3-0 Thu 12. Feb 2026
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jakub Kosakowski (2538) and Nikita Shandrygin (2209) was played at 1. 3-0 Thu 12. Feb 2026 in 2026 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jakub Kosakowski games or Nikita Shandrygin games? This Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin?
Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin (2026) finished 1–0, a win for Jakub Kosakowski.
What opening was played in Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jakub Kosakowski vs Nikita Shandrygin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.