Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak
Rudnik Open 11th, 2000 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lukasz Kopacz (2116)
- Black
- Janusz Wolak (2096)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Rudnik Open 11th
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lukasz Kopacz (2116) and Janusz Wolak (2096) was played at Rudnik Open 11th in 2000 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lukasz Kopacz games or Janusz Wolak games? This Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak?
Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak (2000) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lukasz Kopacz vs Janusz Wolak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.