Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman
NED Ch U20 Open, 2000 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabian Konken
- Black
- Timotheus Koffeman
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- NED Ch U20 Open
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabian Konken and Timotheus Koffeman was played at NED Ch U20 Open in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabian Konken games or Timotheus Koffeman games? This Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman?
Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Fabian Konken.
What opening was played in Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabian Konken vs Timotheus Koffeman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.