Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak
EU/CT2021/ct 1 3, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov (2413)
- Black
- Rudolf Cvak (1934)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/CT2021/ct 1 3
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov (2413) and Rudolf Cvak (1934) was played at EU/CT2021/ct 1 3 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov games or Rudolf Cvak games? This Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak?
Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (ECO D97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikolay Anastasievi Kolpakov vs Rudolf Cvak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.