Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen
Senior DM 65+ 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jens Kolbak (2149)
- Black
- Niels Chr. Davidsen (1964)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Senior DM 65+ 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jens Kolbak (2149) and Niels Chr. Davidsen (1964) was played at Senior DM 65+ 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jens Kolbak games or Niels Chr. Davidsen games? This Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen?
Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Jens Kolbak.
What opening was played in Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jens Kolbak vs Niels Chr. Davidsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.