Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka
POL/C65/sf (POL), 2020 · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marek Kolanowski (2182)
- Black
- Zbigniew Zawadka (2264)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- POL/C65/sf (POL)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marek Kolanowski (2182) and Zbigniew Zawadka (2264) was played at POL/C65/sf (POL) in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marek Kolanowski games or Zbigniew Zawadka games? This Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka?
Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (ECO C56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marek Kolanowski vs Zbigniew Zawadka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.