Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis
Ambelokipi Open 16th, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantinos Kokolias (2014)
- Black
- Michail Keramiotis (1897)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Ambelokipi Open 16th
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantinos Kokolias (2014) and Michail Keramiotis (1897) was played at Ambelokipi Open 16th and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantinos Kokolias games or Michail Keramiotis games? This Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis?
Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis finished 1–0, a win for Konstantinos Kokolias.
What opening was played in Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (ECO B17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantinos Kokolias vs Michail Keramiotis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.