Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Botvinnik Variation (A93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Alexander Chistiakov
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Botvinnik Variation (A93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikhail Saulovich Kogan and Alexander Chistiakov was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Botvinnik Variation (A93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikhail Saulovich Kogan games or Alexander Chistiakov games? This Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Botvinnik Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov?
Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Chistiakov.
What opening was played in Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Botvinnik Variation (ECO A93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikhail Saulovich Kogan vs Alexander Chistiakov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.