Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko
OP-04156, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus-Peter Koepcke (2204)
- Black
- Sergej Kibaljnichenko (2117)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- OP-04156
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus-Peter Koepcke (2204) and Sergej Kibaljnichenko (2117) was played at OP-04156 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus-Peter Koepcke games or Sergej Kibaljnichenko games? This Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko?
Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Sergej Kibaljnichenko.
What opening was played in Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus-Peter Koepcke vs Sergej Kibaljnichenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.