Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz
30. Balaton Open, 2012 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zsolt Koczka (2248)
- Black
- Laszlo Pesztericz (2145)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 30. Balaton Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zsolt Koczka (2248) and Laszlo Pesztericz (2145) was played at 30. Balaton Open in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zsolt Koczka games or Laszlo Pesztericz games? This Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz?
Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zsolt Koczka vs Laszlo Pesztericz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.