Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev
Moscow Aeroflot op-A 10th, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikhail Kobalia (2666)
- Black
- Alexander Riazantsev (2689)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Moscow Aeroflot op-A 10th
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikhail Kobalia (2666) and Alexander Riazantsev (2689) was played at Moscow Aeroflot op-A 10th in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikhail Kobalia games or Alexander Riazantsev games? This Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev?
Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Mikhail Kobalia.
What opening was played in Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikhail Kobalia vs Alexander Riazantsev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.