Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacqueline Kobald (1870)
- Black
- Alexander Kelemen (1703)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacqueline Kobald (1870) and Alexander Kelemen (1703) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacqueline Kobald games or Alexander Kelemen games? This Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen?
Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (ECO B35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacqueline Kobald vs Alexander Kelemen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.