Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston
Commonwealth ch04, 1986 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Simon John Bradley Knott (2365)
- Black
- David Houston
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Commonwealth ch04
- Year
- 1986
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Simon John Bradley Knott (2365) and David Houston was played at Commonwealth ch04 in 1986 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Simon John Bradley Knott games or David Houston games? This Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston?
Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston (1986) finished 0–1, a win for David Houston.
What opening was played in Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Simon John Bradley Knott vs David Houston, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.