Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt
Staunton CC Kings Gambit theme-C, 2002 · Result 1–0 · King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Geon Knol (2154)
- Black
- Erwin Van Pelt (1976)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Staunton CC Kings Gambit theme-C
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Geon Knol (2154) and Erwin Van Pelt (1976) was played at Staunton CC Kings Gambit theme-C in 2002 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Geon Knol games or Erwin Van Pelt games? This Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt?
Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt (2002) finished 1–0, a win for Geon Knol.
What opening was played in Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (ECO C38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Geon Knol vs Erwin Van Pelt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.