Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonhard Knoblauch (2062)
- Black
- Juergen Kaufeld (2260)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonhard Knoblauch (2062) and Juergen Kaufeld (2260) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonhard Knoblauch games or Juergen Kaufeld games? This Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld?
Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonhard Knoblauch vs Juergen Kaufeld, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.