Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens
2015 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Norbert, Dr. Knoblach (1782)
- Black
- Peter Juergens (2258)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Norbert, Dr. Knoblach (1782) and Peter Juergens (2258) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Norbert, Dr. Knoblach games or Peter Juergens games? This Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens?
Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Norbert, Dr. Knoblach vs Peter Juergens, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.