Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen
55. TCh-DEN Ex 2016-17, 2016 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Klitgaard (2217)
- Black
- Nikolaj Mikkelsen (2463)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 55. TCh-DEN Ex 2016-17
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Klitgaard (2217) and Nikolaj Mikkelsen (2463) was played at 55. TCh-DEN Ex 2016-17 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Klitgaard games or Nikolaj Mikkelsen games? This Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen?
Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolaj Mikkelsen.
What opening was played in Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E74).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Klitgaard vs Nikolaj Mikkelsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.