Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys
4NCL Division 2c, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dominic Klingher (2101)
- Black
- Jerry G Humphreys (2041)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4NCL Division 2c
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dominic Klingher (2101) and Jerry G Humphreys (2041) was played at 4NCL Division 2c in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dominic Klingher games or Jerry G Humphreys games? This Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys?
Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jerry G Humphreys.
What opening was played in Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dominic Klingher vs Jerry G Humphreys, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.