Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka
TCh-POL 2. League 2024, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandra Klincewicz (1867)
- Black
- Klara Szczotka (2041)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-POL 2. League 2024
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandra Klincewicz (1867) and Klara Szczotka (2041) was played at TCh-POL 2. League 2024 in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandra Klincewicz games or Klara Szczotka games? This Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka?
Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Klara Szczotka.
What opening was played in Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (ECO E16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandra Klincewicz vs Klara Szczotka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.