Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke
21. HZ Open 2017, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Klepke (2205)
- Black
- Jonas Tibke (1908)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 21. HZ Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Klepke (2205) and Jonas Tibke (1908) was played at 21. HZ Open 2017 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Klepke games or Jonas Tibke games? This Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke?
Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (ECO D63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Klepke vs Jonas Tibke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.