Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev
2009 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Klein (2054)
- Black
- Ivo Nedelchev
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Klein (2054) and Ivo Nedelchev was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Klein games or Ivo Nedelchev games? This Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev?
Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Klein.
What opening was played in Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (ECO A23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Klein vs Ivo Nedelchev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.