Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov
2010 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anders Ludvig Kleimark (1934)
- Black
- Mikhail Dolgov (2016)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anders Ludvig Kleimark (1934) and Mikhail Dolgov (2016) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anders Ludvig Kleimark games or Mikhail Dolgov games? This Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov?
Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Anders Ludvig Kleimark.
What opening was played in Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anders Ludvig Kleimark vs Mikhail Dolgov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.