Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert
2014 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christoph Klamp (2023)
- Black
- Martin, Dr. Launert (1893)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christoph Klamp (2023) and Martin, Dr. Launert (1893) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christoph Klamp games or Martin, Dr. Launert games? This Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert?
Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christoph Klamp vs Martin, Dr. Launert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.