Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero
WLS/SRCCC/19/D2 (WLS), 2019 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Karsten Kjeldsen (2007)
- Black
- Ladislav Lendero (1663)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/SRCCC/19/D2 (WLS)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Karsten Kjeldsen (2007) and Ladislav Lendero (1663) was played at WLS/SRCCC/19/D2 (WLS) in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Karsten Kjeldsen games or Ladislav Lendero games? This Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero?
Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Karsten Kjeldsen vs Ladislav Lendero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.