Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan
4. Marcel Duchamp Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Kiszkiewicz (1772)
- Black
- Horacio Amil Meilan (2164)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4. Marcel Duchamp Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Kiszkiewicz (1772) and Horacio Amil Meilan (2164) was played at 4. Marcel Duchamp Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Kiszkiewicz games or Horacio Amil Meilan games? This Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan?
Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Horacio Amil Meilan.
What opening was played in Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Kiszkiewicz vs Horacio Amil Meilan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.