Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen
Goch Open, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roman Kistella (2310)
- Black
- Klaus Dieter Thoennessen (1970)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Goch Open
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roman Kistella (2310) and Klaus Dieter Thoennessen (1970) was played at Goch Open and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roman Kistella games or Klaus Dieter Thoennessen games? This Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen?
Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen finished 1–0, a win for Roman Kistella.
What opening was played in Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (ECO E17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roman Kistella vs Klaus Dieter Thoennessen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.