Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz
Zamosc POL, 55. Ogolnopolski Ch, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam Kirszenstein (2096)
- Black
- Lukasz Gorzkiewicz (2109)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Zamosc POL, 55. Ogolnopolski Ch
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam Kirszenstein (2096) and Lukasz Gorzkiewicz (2109) was played at Zamosc POL, 55. Ogolnopolski Ch and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam Kirszenstein games or Lukasz Gorzkiewicz games? This Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz?
Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz finished 0–1, a win for Lukasz Gorzkiewicz.
What opening was played in Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam Kirszenstein vs Lukasz Gorzkiewicz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.