Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath
4NCL Division 4 South, 2019 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrew Kirby (1633)
- Black
- Vikram Kamath (1823)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 4 South
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrew Kirby (1633) and Vikram Kamath (1823) was played at 4NCL Division 4 South in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrew Kirby games or Vikram Kamath games? This Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath?
Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrew Kirby vs Vikram Kamath, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.