Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay
2009 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kvetoslav Kir (1759)
- Black
- Miroslav Ducay (2015)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kvetoslav Kir (1759) and Miroslav Ducay (2015) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kvetoslav Kir games or Miroslav Ducay games? This Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay?
Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kvetoslav Kir vs Miroslav Ducay, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.