Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem
La Habana olm fin-B, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anton Kinzel
- Black
- Hong Gie Liem
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- La Habana olm fin-B
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anton Kinzel and Hong Gie Liem was played at La Habana olm fin-B and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anton Kinzel games or Hong Gie Liem games? This Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem?
Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem finished 1–0, a win for Anton Kinzel.
What opening was played in Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anton Kinzel vs Hong Gie Liem, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.