Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach
Wien AUT, 8. Kavalier Open, 2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Georg Kilgus (2428)
- Black
- Jakob Gstach (2209)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Wien AUT, 8. Kavalier Open
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Georg Kilgus (2428) and Jakob Gstach (2209) was played at Wien AUT, 8. Kavalier Open in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Georg Kilgus games or Jakob Gstach games? This Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach?
Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (ECO E68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Georg Kilgus vs Jakob Gstach, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.