Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz
TCh-POL Ekstraliga 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dorota Kika (2210)
- Black
- Barbara Jaracz (2295)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-POL Ekstraliga 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dorota Kika (2210) and Barbara Jaracz (2295) was played at TCh-POL Ekstraliga 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dorota Kika games or Barbara Jaracz games? This Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz?
Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Dorota Kika.
What opening was played in Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dorota Kika vs Barbara Jaracz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.