Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev
27. Sharjah Int Blitz, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Khaled Khalifah (2057)
- Black
- Alexander Zubarev (2372)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 27. Sharjah Int Blitz
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Khaled Khalifah (2057) and Alexander Zubarev (2372) was played at 27. Sharjah Int Blitz in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Khaled Khalifah games or Alexander Zubarev games? This Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev?
Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Zubarev.
What opening was played in Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Khaled Khalifah vs Alexander Zubarev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.